Back to Articles

Reinforcement Learning: Reward Engineering in Production

Industry case studies & OpenAI research on reward design

"When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure." — Goodhart's Law

The Hardest Part Isn't the Algorithm

You can download a state-of-the-art RL algorithm in minutes. Q-learning, PPO, A3C—the math is solved. The hard part? Defining the reward function that actually aligns with what you want.

Get it wrong, and your agent will optimize for the letter of your instructions while violating the spirit. It'll find shortcuts, exploit loopholes, and deliver technically correct but practically useless behavior.

What Is Reinforcement Learning?

RL is learning through trial and error. An agent:

1. Observes the current state
2. Takes an action
3. Receives a reward (positive or negative)
4. Observes the new state
5. Repeats

Over thousands or millions of iterations, the agent learns a policy: a mapping from states to actions that maximizes cumulative reward.

Common Reward Design Failures

1. Reward Hacking

The agent discovers unintended ways to maximize reward without achieving your actual goal.

2. Sparse Rewards

Reward only at the end: +1 for success, 0 otherwise. In complex environments with long horizons, the agent rarely experiences reward during training. It's searching for a needle in a haystack—exploration never finds signal.

3. Dense But Misleading Rewards

Giving reward at every step can guide learning, but if the intermediate rewards don't align with the final goal, you get local optima.

Principles of Good Reward Design

1. Shape the Reward, Don't Just Define the Goal

Instead of only rewarding the final outcome, provide incremental rewards for progress. But ensure intermediate rewards align with the final objective.

2. Penalize Unwanted Behavior

If there are failure modes you want to avoid (e.g., customer complaints, safety violations), explicitly penalize them. Don't assume the agent will avoid them by omission.

3. Balance Short-Term and Long-Term

Use discount factors to balance immediate rewards vs. future consequences. High discount (e.g., 0.99) makes the agent far-sighted; low discount (e.g., 0.5) makes it short-sighted.

4. Test for Exploits

Before full deployment, adversarially test the reward function. Can you imagine ways the agent could "cheat"? Add constraints or penalties to prevent those loopholes.

Business Applications

Dynamic Pricing

An RL agent adjusts prices based on demand, inventory, and competitor actions. Reward: profit per sale. But if you only reward profit, the agent might set prices so high that volume collapses. Add a term for maintaining market share or customer retention.

Recommendation Systems

Reward: clicks on recommended content. Problem: the agent learns to recommend clickbait. Better reward: clicks weighted by time spent engaging with content, plus user return rate. Now the agent optimizes for genuine engagement, not manipulation.

Warehouse Robotics

Reward: items picked per hour. Issue: robots might damage goods by moving recklessly or ignore low-priority orders. Solution: reward throughput but penalize damage, and weight orders by priority.

Advanced Techniques

Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Instead of hand-designing rewards, learn them from expert demonstrations. Observe humans performing the task, then infer what reward function would explain their behavior. The agent then optimizes that learned reward.

Multi-Objective RL

When you have conflicting objectives (speed vs. safety, profit vs. sustainability), train with multiple reward functions. Then let human operators specify trade-offs at deployment time via preference elicitation.

Reward Shaping with Potential Functions

Add rewards based on "potential" progress toward the goal. Mathematically, this doesn't change the optimal policy (if done correctly) but accelerates learning by providing denser signal.

The Alignment Problem

Reward engineering is a microcosm of the broader AI alignment challenge: building systems that do what we mean, not just what we say.

"The primary difficulty is not teaching AI to maximize reward. It's defining reward functions that capture our true preferences, including all the implicit constraints and values we take for granted."

Practical Implementation Checklist

1. Define success clearly – What does "good" look like? Get stakeholder alignment.
2. Enumerate failure modes – What are the ways this could go wrong?
3. Design reward components – Break the objective into measurable sub-goals.
4. Simulate edge cases – Test the reward function in extreme scenarios.
5. Monitor during training – Watch for unexpected behaviors emerging.
6. Iterate – Reward design is rarely right on the first try. Adjust based on observed behavior.

When RL Isn't the Answer

If you can't define the reward function clearly, RL will struggle. Consider:

• Supervised learning – When you have labeled examples of desired behavior
• Imitation learning – When expert demonstrations are available
• Rule-based systems – When the policy is well-understood and doesn't need to adapt

Tools and Frameworks

• Stable-Baselines3 (Python) – Reliable RL implementations
• RLlib (Ray) – Scalable RL for production
• OpenAI Gym / Gymnasium – Standard environments for testing
• TensorFlow Agents – Google's RL library

Further Reading

• Sutton & Barto: "Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction" (2nd ed)
• Amodei et al. (2016): "Concrete Problems in AI Safety" (OpenAI)
• Ng, Harada, & Russell (1999): "Policy Invariance Under Reward Transformations"
• Hadfield-Menell et al. (2017): "Inverse Reward Design"

Back to Articles